OpenAI announced a Request for Proposals to reshore manufacturing across consumer electronics, robotics, and data center infrastructure to the United States over the next decade. The initiative represents more than procurement strategy—it signals recognition that AI infrastructure development depends on physical supply chains that require the same level of innovation attention as algorithmic advancement.
The program, announced January 15, 2026, seeks to create a domestic ecosystem for components shaping AI deployment: consumer electronics modules, robotics inputs, and extensive data center equipment supporting increasingly sophisticated AI models. The RFP states that the company has a "a long-term ambition to establish US-based hardware manufacturing and assembly that reflects US values, supports resilient supply chains, and fosters national innovation leadership."
The objective stems from the conviction that for AI to realize its full potential, the infrastructure supporting it must match its algorithmic sophistication. This represents an acknowledgment that advanced digital systems remain constrained by physical-world limitations, regardless of computational capabilities.
Three-Sector Manufacturing Strategy
The expansion strategy is organized around consumer devices, robotics, and data centers—each requiring sophisticated supplier and manufacturer networks that currently operate primarily outside the United States.
Consumer device manufacturing focuses on final assembly, printed circuit board assembly, and the creation of advanced displays and optics. This could indicate future product strategies in which AI-branded hardware becomes commonplace in everyday contexts, extending beyond software services into physical products that require manufacturing capabilities.
Robotics manufacturing relies on critical components, including actuators, precision bearings, gearboxes, and power electronics. These components enable integrating AI into physical workspaces through robots and automated systems that depend on precision mechanical components with tight tolerances and reliable performance under operational stress.
Data center infrastructure is the most capital-intensive sector, focusing on power systems—generators, transformers, and uninterruptible power supplies—and advanced cooling technologies, including chillers and cold plates. The RFP document emphasizes that "advanced AI depends on a much broader ecosystem of physical components: the racks, cabling, networking gear, cooling systems, power systems, power electronics, electromechanical modules and testing and assembly capacity are all required to bring it all online at scale."
The Infrastructure Reality Behind AI Deployment
The initiative acknowledges that discussions about AI often begin and end with semiconductor chips, but operational reality proves considerably more complex. Computational capacity requires supporting infrastructure that extends far beyond processors, encompassing power distribution, thermal management, networking equipment, and the physical facilities that house these systems.
Data centers consuming megawatts or gigawatts of power need electrical infrastructure that many locations cannot provide. Cooling systems that remove heat from dense server configurations require water resources, refrigeration capacity, and waste heat management, which present engineering and environmental challenges. Networking equipment that moves data between processors, storage systems, and users must operate reliably at scales where millisecond latencies and packet losses cause measurable performance degradation.
The company's leadership believes "infrastructure has long been destiny when it comes to America's economic success, and that will be especially true in the Intelligence Age," according to Supply Chain Digital. Through investment in domestic production, the organization seeks to "catalyse US manufacturing, modernise our energy grid, create well-paid jobs and strengthen American leadership."
This rhetoric connects AI infrastructure to broader industrial policy objectives around manufacturing revitalization, workforce development, and economic competitiveness. The framing positions reshoring not merely as supply chain risk mitigation but as a strategic investment in national capabilities.
Ten-Year Timeline Reflects Infrastructure Reality
The RFP establishes a ten-year timeline for localizing significant manufacturing portions for hardware devices and data centers, including key components, modules, and final assembly. This extended horizon reflects a realistic assessment of timelines required for manufacturing capacity development rather than optimistic assumptions about rapid transformation.
Building domestic manufacturing capabilities requires facility construction, equipment procurement, workforce development, process qualification, and customer approval before reaching volume production. For complex components like precision actuators, power electronics, or advanced cooling systems, these timelines extend multiple years, even with committed investment and prioritized execution.
The decade-long timeframe also acknowledges that supply chain transformation cannot occur solely through procurement decisions. Domestic manufacturing ecosystems require supplier networks, technical expertise, quality systems, and operational experience that develop gradually through sustained investment and iterative improvement. Attempting to compress these timelines with additional capital typically yields disappointing results, as physical processes, learning curves, and qualification requirements ultimately determine the actual pace.
The initiative follows the trajectory of the Stargate Project launched in March 2025, where the company has made considerable progress toward its 10-gigawatt power commitment, with capacity plans now exceeding the halfway mark. This reference point suggests the organization views infrastructure development as a multi-year undertaking requiring sustained commitment through planning, construction, and commissioning phases before operational capabilities materialize.
Domestic Manufacturing Challenges Beyond Capital
Establishing US-based manufacturing for consumer electronics, robotics components, and data center infrastructure faces challenges extending beyond capital availability. The United States currently lacks manufacturing capacity, technical expertise, and supplier ecosystems across many component categories, following decades of offshoring to Asia.
Consumer electronics final assembly requires specialized equipment, trained workforces, and quality control systems that few US facilities currently possess at scale. Robotics components like precision gearboxes and actuators require machining capabilities, materials expertise, and testing infrastructure that are concentrated in established manufacturing regions abroad. Data center power and cooling equipment involves specialized engineering disciplines, fabrication capabilities, and operational knowledge that domestic suppliers may need to rebuild.
The talent challenge compounds physical infrastructure requirements. Manufacturing engineering expertise, production management capabilities, and specialized technical skills have atrophied in many US regions as manufacturing employment declined. Rebuilding these capabilities requires not just hiring existing talent but developing educational programs, apprenticeship systems, and career pathways that attract workers into manufacturing roles.
Supplier ecosystem development presents additional complexity. Manufacturing sophisticated products requires networks of component suppliers, materials providers, equipment manufacturers, and specialized service providers. When primary manufacturers reshore, they create demand for supplier capabilities that may not exist domestically. This chicken-and-egg dynamic means early reshoring efforts face higher costs and longer lead times until sufficient volume attracts supplier investment.
The Economic Viability Question
Reshoring manufacturing to the United States typically increases production costs relative to established Asian manufacturing bases due to higher labor costs, less developed supplier ecosystems, and smaller production scales. For this economic disadvantage to prove acceptable, either customers must accept higher prices, companies must accept lower margins, or productivity improvements must offset cost differences.
The RFP's emphasis on domestic manufacturing "that reflects US values, supports resilient supply chains, and fosters national innovation leadership" suggests a willingness to accept cost premiums for supply chain security, political alignment, and strategic autonomy. This represents a shift from pure economic optimization to multi-criteria decision-making that incorporates resilience, control, and policy considerations.
However, sustained commitment to higher-cost domestic manufacturing requires either competitive advantages justifying premium pricing or sufficient financial resources to absorb margin compression during transition periods. Organizations pursuing reshoring must maintain commitment through inevitable challenges—cost overruns, quality issues, timeline delays—that make reverting to established offshore suppliers tempting.
The competitive dynamics also matter. If competitors maintain offshore manufacturing to achieve lower costs, domestic manufacturers face pressure to match pricing while absorbing higher production costs. This dynamic has undermined previous reshoring efforts, where initial enthusiasm gave way to economic reality and competitive pressure.
What the RFP Reveals About AI Infrastructure Constraints
The manufacturing reshoring initiative reveals that AI deployment faces constraints that extend well beyond algorithmic capabilities, training data availability, and computational efficiency. Physical infrastructure—power systems, cooling equipment, networking gear, and facility construction—determines how quickly organizations can deploy AI systems regardless of software readiness.
The emphasis on consumer devices and robotics components suggests expectations that AI will extend beyond cloud services into physical products that require manufacturing capabilities currently concentrated offshore. Organizations planning AI product strategies must consider not only software development timelines but also access to manufacturing capacity, component availability, and supply chain resilience.
The ten-year horizon signals that infrastructure constraints won't resolve quickly through market forces alone. Organizations that depend on AI infrastructure expansion should expect persistent supply constraints, extended lead times, and capacity allocation challenges as demand growth outpaces supply expansion across multiple components and subsystems.
For supply chain executives, the initiative illustrates that even organizations with substantial financial resources and technical capabilities face fundamental challenges in reshoring complex manufacturing. Success requires sustained commitment, realistic timelines, and a willingness to invest in capability development that may take years to produce returns. The alternative—maintaining dependence on offshore supply chains—carries risks related to geopolitical tensions, trade restrictions, and supply disruptions, as recent years have repeatedly demonstrated.
Ready to transform your supply chain with AI-powered freight audit? Talk to our team about how Trax can deliver measurable results.