AI in Supply Chain: Where Human Intelligence Still Beats Algorithms

Artificial intelligence promises to transform supply chain operations through automation, pattern recognition, and large-scale data processing. The technology delivers on many of these promises. But a critical question remains largely unaddressed: where should organizations deploy AI, and where should they preserve human decision-making? According to insights from the 30th Annual 3PL Study and Trax's freight market analysis, the answer isn't either-or. It's understanding which problems require which approach.

The Right Place and Right Time for AI Deployment

Organizations should exercise caution about when to deploy AI versus when to rely on human intelligence. The fundamental principle: whenever context is critical for decision-making, shy away from heavily automated processes. AI systems need guardrails to ensure true exceptions are kicked out for human intervention rather than processed by algorithms that lack situational understanding.

The risk isn't that AI will make obviously wrong decisions. The danger is more subtle: AI can muddy the waters when unexpected events occur because rule sets make decisions without a complete picture or necessary context. During periods of disruption—which have become the norm rather than the exception—context often determines whether decisions prove correct or catastrophic.

Where AI Excels in Supply Chain Operations

AI delivers clear value for repetitive processes involving large data volumes. Consider the multivariate math problem: why is cost to serve increasing? This seemingly simple question involves approximately fifteen variables that fluctuate independently. Transportation rates change. Fuel costs vary. Routing efficiency shifts. Warehouse utilization evolves. Carrier performance fluctuates.

For problems where the data is fundamentally sound, the ask is fairly simple and repeated, and patterns emerge from the information volume, AI provides tremendous value. These applications churn through data that would take humans weeks to analyze, identifying patterns and anomalies that might otherwise remain invisible until they've created significant problems.

The Data Quality Prerequisite

However, AI's effectiveness depends entirely on data quality. Bad data produces bad answers regardless of algorithmic sophistication. Organizations must start with data governance strategies before deploying AI solutions. This means partnering with logistics service providers to improve data quality in transmitted information—whether that's advanced shipping notices, EDI events, or invoice data.

Data normalization becomes foundational. Trax works closely with customers and logistics service providers because shippers rely heavily on data derived from billing documents, transportation management systems, and warehouse management systems. Without proper data governance, normalization strategies, and quality frameworks, AI implementations fail before they begin.

Human Expertise for Complex Decision-Making

Human intelligence remains essential for complex decisions involving multiple variables and uncertain contexts. The forward-buying decision during tariff uncertainty exemplifies this. Was bringing inventory in early to avoid tariffs ultimately beneficial? The answer depends on how tariff negotiations concluded, how long inventory sat in warehouses, what carrying costs accumulated, and what opportunity costs resulted from capital locked in inventory.

Only human intuition and experience can navigate these decisions. Organizations made choices based on incomplete information about future events. Some decisions proved optimal. Others didn't. But AI couldn't have made better decisions because the problem wasn't computational—it was strategic judgment under uncertainty about unprecedented events.

Reading the Tea Leaves: Pattern Recognition Beyond Data

Experienced supply chain professionals develop abilities to see patterns and interpret data in meaningful ways that algorithms cannot replicate. This isn't mystical. It's accumulated knowledge about how systems behave under various conditions, understanding of which data points matter most in specific situations, and recognition of when data might be misleading or representing short-term anomalies.

The risk of overreacting to short-term data anomalies and creating long-term costs requires human judgment. Should organizations ignore temporary fluctuations because responding would create worse problems than the fluctuation itself? These decisions require understanding operational context, strategic objectives, and potential second-order effects that AI systems can't currently evaluate.

The Implementation Balance in Practice

Organizations should focus AI on problems that don't require extensive context and involve processing large data volumes. Exception management in freight audit provides good examples. When the same types of invoice discrepancies recur with clear resolution patterns, AI can automatically identify and recommend fixes. Human intervention remains necessary for unusual situations that don't fit established patterns.

Similarly, demand forecasting benefits from AI's ability to process multiple variables simultaneously—historical sales, seasonality, marketing campaigns, and economic indicators. But humans must interpret forecasts in light of unprecedented events such as pandemics, major policy changes, or black swan events that fall outside the historical patterns the AI was trained on.

Building Systems That Leverage Both Approaches

The most effective supply chain operations combine AI analytical power with human strategic intelligence. This means designing systems in which AI handles high-volume, repetitive analysis and flags situations that require human judgment. It means training people to understand what AI can reliably handle versus where human oversight remains essential.

Organizations must resist the temptation to automate everything just because technology makes it possible. The question isn't "can we automate this?" but rather "should we automate this, given the context requirements and potential consequences of errors?" Sometimes, the right answer is to preserve human decision-making despite automation.

Strategic Implications for Supply Chain Leaders

Supply chain leaders must develop clear frameworks for determining when to deploy AI versus when to rely on human judgment. This requires understanding both technology capabilities and limitations. It means investing in data quality infrastructure that makes AI effective where it's deployed. And it means preserving and developing human expertise for decisions that require contextual understanding algorithms cannot provide.

The future of supply chain management isn't human versus AI. It's humans and AI working together, each handling what they do best. Organizations that get this balance right will outperform competitors who either over-rely on automation or fail to capture AI's benefits for appropriate use cases.

Watch the full discussion between Trax EVP Steve Beda and NTT Data Director Allison Dow: Trax Freight Market Report Webinar

Subscribe to the monthly Trax Freight Market Report

Visit our daily AI in Supply Chain blog

Download the NTT Data 2026 3PL Study: NTT Data Supply Chain Consulting

Reach out to NTT Data: Supply Chain Consulting Services