Organizations rush to implement artificial intelligence across supply chain operations, attracted by promises of automation, optimization, and intelligent decision-making. Yet most of these implementations deliver disappointing results or fail entirely. The problem isn't the AI technology itself. The problem is that organizations deploy sophisticated algorithms on foundations of poor data quality, inconsistent formats, and fragmented systems. AI cannot solve data governance problems. In fact, AI ruthlessly exposes them.
Bad Data Produces Bad AI Outputs
The principle is straightforward: bad data will give bad answers. AI systems don't magically fix data quality issues. They amplify them. When an AI model trains on incomplete, inconsistent, or inaccurate data, it learns patterns that don't reflect operational reality. The resulting recommendations may appear authoritative—complete with confidence scores and detailed rationales—while being fundamentally wrong.
This creates a dangerous situation. Humans reviewing obviously flawed manual analysis can spot problems. But AI-generated insights wrapped in sophisticated presentations can obscure underlying data quality issues. Organizations make strategic decisions based on AI recommendations without recognizing that garbage data produced garbage outputs, however elegantly presented.
The freight audit process provides clear examples. Shippers rely heavily on data consumed and translated from billing documents, transportation management systems, and warehouse management systems. If this source data contains errors, inconsistencies, or gaps, any AI system analyzing it will produce unreliable results regardless of algorithmic sophistication.
Data Normalization as Starting Point
Data normalization strategies must precede AI implementation. Organizations partnering with logistics service providers need to improve data quality in transmitted information whether that's advanced shipping notices, EDI events, or invoice data. Without normalized data across carriers, geographies, modes, and currencies, AI systems cannot identify meaningful patterns or generate accurate insights.
Normalization means more than converting units of measurement or standardizing date formats. It requires establishing consistent definitions for key data elements across systems, documenting field mappings, establishing naming conventions, and defining data ownership and stewardship roles. This foundational work isn't glamorous, but it's absolutely essential.
Organizations often want to skip this step, viewing data normalization as tedious technical work that delays the exciting AI implementations they've been promised. This impatience guarantees failure. AI systems require clean, consistent, standardized data to function reliably. There's no shortcut.
The Data Governance Infrastructure Requirement
Beyond data normalization, AI success requires data governance infrastructure. Somebody needs to drive the data governance strategy. Somebody needs to maintain the center of excellence, or whatever structure, to achieve stronger data governance. These aren't one-time projects but ongoing organizational capabilities.
Data governance encompasses policies, procedures, standards, and organizational structures that ensure data quality, accessibility, consistency, and security. It defines who can access what data, how data quality gets measured and maintained, how data flows between systems, and how data-related issues get resolved.
Without this infrastructure, data quality degrades over time. Systems get updated without coordinating data format changes. New data sources get added without integration planning. Exceptions and workarounds accumulate. Within months, the clean data that enabled initial AI success becomes fragmented and unreliable again.
Integration Across Disparate Systems
Supply chain data exists across multiple systems: ERP platforms, transportation management systems, warehouse management systems, procurement platforms, and carrier systems operating in isolation. Each system uses different data formats, definitions, and structures. AI applications that need holistic supply chain visibility must integrate data across all these sources.
This integration challenge extends beyond technical connectivity. Systems must share data in ways that preserve meaning and context. A shipment weight in the transportation management system must reliably link to the corresponding invoice line item, warehouse receipt, and purchase order—even when these systems use different identifiers and formats.
Organizations underestimate the complexity and effort required for this integration. It's not simply API connections between systems. It's creating data architectures that enable consistent, reliable data flow while maintaining data quality, handling exceptions, and providing audit trails. These capabilities require sustained investment and dedicated expertise.
Why Organizations Resist Data Governance Investment
Data governance investments face persistent resistance because they don't deliver immediate, visible returns. Executives can envision AI systems that optimize routes, predict demand, or automate decisions. They struggle to get excited about data dictionaries, quality frameworks, and governance committees.
Business cases for AI platforms promise specific ROI through cost reduction or efficiency gains. Business cases for data governance describe risk mitigation and capability building—important but less tangible benefits. This creates a natural tendency to fund the AI platform while underfunding the data governance infrastructure it requires.
The irony is that without data governance investment, the AI platform investment produces minimal returns. Organizations essentially build sophisticated analytical engines on the foundations of quicksand. The AI works as designed, but working with bad data yields unreliable insights that can't support confident decision-making.
The Hidden Costs in AI Business Cases
When evaluating AI investments, organizations must include data governance costs in business cases. This means staffing for data quality management, establishing governance structures, investing in data integration capabilities, and maintaining these capabilities over time. These softer investments often get overlooked in business cases focused on technology platforms.
Including these costs can make AI investments look less attractive in the short term. A sophisticated AI platform might cost a certain amount, but the data governance infrastructure required for it to function effectively might cost as much or more. Organizations unwilling to fund both investments shouldn't fund either.
The alternative—implementing AI without proper data governance—wastes money on technology that can't deliver promised results. Organizations would achieve better outcomes by postponing AI implementation until they've built adequate data governance foundations. This discipline proves difficult when competitors announce AI initiatives and vendors promise transformative results.
Data Sharing Between Partners
Data governance challenges intensify when supply chain operations involve multiple organizations. Shippers and 3PLs must share data to enable AI applications that optimize across organizational boundaries. This requires establishing data governance frameworks that span organizations—defining what data gets shared, in what formats, with what quality standards, and with what security controls.
The trust required for this data sharing reinforces why strategic partnerships have become essential. Organizations won't share operational data with vendors in transactional relationships. They will share data with strategic partners when mutual benefit is clear and governance frameworks protect both parties' interests.
Building these inter-organizational data governance frameworks requires even more effort than internal governance. Different organizations have different systems, standards, and priorities. Aligning these differences while maintaining data quality and security requires sustained collaboration and commitment.
Building Sustainable AI Capabilities
Organizations serious about AI success must prioritize data governance as a foundational capability rather than a technical prerequisite to be minimized. This means investing in people, processes, and systems that ensure data quality. It means establishing governance structures with authority to enforce standards. And it means maintaining these capabilities as AI implementations scale.
The organizations achieving meaningful AI results in supply chain operations share a common characteristic: they invested heavily in data governance before deploying AI at scale. They recognized that sophisticated algorithms cannot compensate for poor data quality. They built foundations that enable AI to deliver value rather than exposing data problems.
Watch the full discussion between Trax EVP Steve Beda and NTT Data Director Allison Dow: Trax Freight Market Report Webinar
Subscribe to the monthly Trax Freight Market Report
Visit our daily AI in Supply Chain blog
Download the NTT Data 2026 3PL Study: NTT Data Supply Chain Consulting
Reach out to NTT Data: Supply Chain Consulting Services